“It Ain’t Over”
Freedom activists are critical thinkers!
Our society is so dumbed down and indoctrinated that anyone who is a critical thinker is labeled as a Conspiracy Theorist
Did you know: The term ‘conspiracy theorist’ was first coined and used by the CIA to ridicule anyone who opposed the gov’t narrative?
————————————–
————————————–
Courts
Falsified assault charge
Kelowna Courthouse
R v David Lindsay s. 266 Criminal Code Assault
Next Provincial Court Hearing Date:
Completed
Thank you for all your support and belief for freedom!!
Remember the Freedom Principle:
An attack against one is an attack against all.
An attack against all, is an attack against one.
Next Supreme Court Appeal Hearing Date:
Monday, August 19, 2024 2:00 p.m.
Application for release from jail pending appeal
Crown Persecutor Grabavac will undoubtedly oppose this on every technicality he can find.
September 9, 2024 — 10:00 a.m.
Notice of Conviction Appeal Hearing
This hearing date was set on Monday, July 22. It was once again set over to Sept. 9 to set the agenda for the hearing of the appeal from the conviction and sentence of J. Heinrichs.
Sentencing Judgment – Comments
Hi everyone. I would like to just begin by thanking God and Jesus for their protection on Friday, so that I remain able to still write to you today!!! Everyone’s prayers once again, made a big difference against the evils we are up against.
Importantly, I also would like to thank all of you so very much for all your kind support, in and outside of the courthouse this past Friday at the sentencing hearing. Some of you came from far away and I know many are watching intensely across the country. Your ongoing moral support is what will keep me going to preserve our rights and freedoms as well. Surrender is not an option!
This case has been a troubling example of a politically motivated and malicious prosecution. From the outset, it resembled a show trial, raising serious concerns about the erosion of our rights and freedoms. Government officials appear to be overstepping legal and Constitutional boundaries, yet when individuals peacefully object or resist, they face charges—an attempt to deter others from exercising their rights and freedoms. This sentencing hearing falls along this path.
The judiciary’s role in this politicization is equally concerning. The judiciary, who are being trained in the background by the political executive contrary to all our fundamental laws, are complicit in this politicization of the judiciary. Make no mistake, J. Heinrichs, who is a family law lawyer and judge, should not be hearing criminal law cases. It’s essential that judges, like J. Heinrichs, have appropriate training in criminal law. Assigning a family law specialist to a criminal case is akin to having an electrician paint a house—both are tradespeople, but their expertise is materially distinct. J. Heinrichs should be required to obtain some formal criminal law training before hearing any criminal law case, not learning on the go with the Crown telling her what to do, at my (or any other accused’s) expense.
Having Gov’t officials break the law and/or deny us our rights and freedoms and then charge us and have the Crown prosecute us and protect the criminal gov’t officials, is an emerging tyrannical policy now known as “Grabavism”, from David Grabavic, the Crown Persecutor who argues this very position in my court hearing. Start using this term frequently so it sticks to him.
Repulsively, when I first raised this back on April 12, 2024, Grabavac actually took perverse pleasure in this derogatory characteristic by immediately smiling and turning around to the media and giving them the ‘thumbs up’ right in the court room, as he has done repeatedly throughout these proceedings. Grabavac has been working with the BC Ragbloid media from the beginning and destroyed any semblance of independence of the Crown.
Forward to Friday, Aug. 9. Grabavac shows up with a mask on. I would like to say, “unbelievably” but nothing is unbelievable with this political persecutor. If he was truly sick, he should have stayed home, right? But putting me in jail is just far too important for the political elite. I can only surmise how much oxygen deprivation he inflicted upon himself.
I opened up the hearing by stating the importance of not releasing my home address on the court record. Grabavac has been arguing from the beginning of sentencing that my address has to be made part of the public record, in the absence of any reasons for so doing – known as doxing. I brought to Heinrich’s attention the safety issues and concerns, especially as I have been threatened in the past, as well as to the safety of families and children in the area. The only reason Grabavac wants my address on the court record, is for special interest groups to harass me and to prejudice me and violate my privacy. This raises questions about Grabavac’s true motives behind such insistence.
I provided case law showing that judges have in the past, made similar orders without releasing the address publicly of the accused, only that the accused provide his address to the probation officer. Grabavac objected claiming that the issue was never adjudicated upon, but it didn’t have to be – the judge made the order in the past as he had the power to do so and this conclusively showed that J. Heinrichs had this power as well. Heinrichs eventually did not release my address upon the public record, though in visible reluctance, and there remains other concerns which I shall refrain from making public.
I suspect Grabavac would be much more reluctant, if not completely opposed to having his home address made public. But if you’ve done nothing wrong Grabavac, why would you be concerned???? Grabavac is clearly promoting doxing of myself, but I don’t think it would be as appealing if he was the recipient – and this is in no way indicative of any suggestion to so do, only to point out that this is the low that the Crown has stooped to.
Make no mistake, Grabavac should only be working in China or Russia or some other Communist country, not a common law country such as ours (and still is.) Remember, the common law does not recognize any other form of law – it can only be taken away from us by fraud/unlawful force. When this happens, as history shows, eventually people do what is required to get our law back. Fortunately, our common law has not been stolen from us as of yet.
On to the sentencing. The first issue was the assaults. I knew within two minutes what was about to happen. J. Heinrich’s exclusive recital of Crown case law set the stage for what was about to happen. Heinrichs made no reference to any of my authorities, nor the Constitutional principle of justice in mercy. I remind everyone that at the sentencing hearing submissions, Heinrichs denied my Constitutional right to put my evidence before the Court, yet allowing the Crown to tender all the evidence he wanted to do, including the video of myself on A4C’s Empower Hour, criticizing the judge as I have the right at law to so do. The denial of my right to present evidence undermines the fairness of the proceedings.
Of course, Heinrichs did use this against me. She also relied upon the Meads v Meads case as argued by Grabavac, which has no relevance to this case at all. This was a 10+ year old Alta. case where J. Rooke spent 800+ paragraphs searching every court case in Canada to characterize everyone who believes in freedom as invoking pseudo-legal arguments. I have never had any decision declared to be so. This is a long story, suffice to say here, no judge can create a new ‘category’ of offences or wrongs, and use previous case law to pigeon hole the people into this new category with all the repercussions that flow from same.
The judge does not have retroactive nor retrospective powers and cannot change past decisions. Moreover, he cannot do this without, minimally, giving everyone he plans to quote in his new category, the opportunity to defend themselves as to why they should not be included. This of course, was never done contrary to the Constitutional principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
Should a judge decide he is going to create a new category of case law, it starts from the day of pronouncement only, going forward. Every lawyer is fully aware of these facts and this merely illustrates, yet again, that the judiciary has been politically motivated and corrupted in Canada. There is an all-out war in Canada between the leftist, Socialist appointed judiciary, and Canadians who demand their fundamental rights and freedoms be judicially respected.
Under the Criminal Code, and the common law right to full answer and defence which applies to sentencing hearings as well, I have the right to provide affidavit evidence during sentencing and the Judge was completely wrong to deny this to me, in addition to denying all my video evidence. But that has been the case throughout the trial. Grabavac was allowed to introduce any evidence he wanted, but I was again denied my fundamental right to cross-examine on the most important parts of this evidence, and to provide my own evidence. This is how they win – make sure my evidence is not on the record – no evidence and you (me) lose.
The sentence was pretty much as the Crown requested, except for the time involved. Even though the Crown backed off on the DNA sample when I proved that the judge should not be issuing this order for lack of grounds to so do, Heinrichs issued this order anyway. The imposition of DNA sampling, despite the lack of grounds, is alarming. Unfortunately, there is no provision in the Criminal Code to stop this DNA sample prior to the appeal being heard. When I mentioned this in court, Heinrichs said if I win it would be destroyed. My response was precise and clear: no one trusts the RCMP to destroy this information once it is in the database and most importantly, there is absolutely no independent method of verification. What if they simply transfer it to a memory stick and onto another computer? Her response was to deny this and claim we had a difference of opinion. Despite this, the RCMP member agreed with me Tuesday morning that there is no way for me to verify if it has been destroyed off their database or not. The lack of transparency and accountability regarding the handling of this data raises significant privacy concerns.
The only purpose for the DNA sample was to use it to falsify charges against me in the future.
The conditions of my release are excessively restrictive, limiting my freedom of expression and imposing unnecessary hardships, after Heinrichs admitted that I was of no threat to the community. These measures seem designed to unfairly and unjustly punish and frighten others, rather than seek justice.
There was an order for probation for two years, with conditions similar to those of the actual sentence, including a restriction on my Constitutional freedom of expression. Hence, I cannot mention this information here.
There was a three-year weapons prohibition issued, for some unknown reason as there were no weapons on me or on anyone else that was present.
I was ordered to serve a four-month sentence at home. I cannot leave except for emergency visits, and court appearances. I have to get others to do shopping for me or unnecessarily pay to have delivery. The Crown opposed every form of mercy that could have existed, as did the judge.
Heinrichs was, as usual, a cold-hearted and biased judge in her delivery and sentence. Nothing mattered except throwing the book at me for something I was, maintain and will maintain till the day I die, innocent of, if not entrapment by the Gov’t. The entire sentence was predicated upon Heinrich’s claim that I was challenging authority. But as I attempted to submit in court, what if there was no authority? This is precisely why Grabavac entered all his evidence that I was suspended from entry to the IH building, but Heinrichs denied me any cross examination or video evidence to prove otherwise on this very point.
Heinrichs repeatedly called my attempt to enter the Interior Health building on Aug 19, 2021, “violence.” This is amazingly false. I dealt with this in sentencing, defining how the courts and dictionaries have defined what violence truly is, and it is not the mere touching of someone, even with intention, lest a slap on the back from friend saying hi, would also constitute violence. This was done intentionally, merely to make me appear as this horrible, violent man in our corrupted Ragbloid media. Anyone who has seen the video and is aware of the falsified lies by security officials that I caused a disturbance (which we also have on video to conclusively prove otherwise), knows that any such claim is fundamentally wrong.
Courts have maintained that for an assault to occur, there must be some animus or hostility. The video shows that there was none, and Heinrichs again, ignored all this case law.
There were 19 conditions attached to my release. 19!!!! Virtually the only thing Heinrichs didn’t do was tell me what time of day I could use the washroom.
Heinrichs claimed that signs by our protestors were “violent” and caused a risk for people to be violent. No one can honestly or reasonably state that one sign out of dozens being held by a 95 lb woman that says, “You can take your masks and shove them up Bonnie Henry’s ass”, is a call to violence. It is a legitimate and bona fide sign of anger and opposition that we are justifiably and Constitutionally entitled to express. There is no evidence that this sign or any other sign, was evidence of any risk of violence, lest every protest in Canada over the past five years be declared violent. That the RCMP have repeatedly acknowledged our protest were peaceful was again completely ignored by Heinrichs.
She raised issues that had no relation to the charge itself, such as previous court activities by me decades ago, leaving out of course all the successes that I have had, which the Crown, who is supposed to only provide the truth, conveniently omits from their narrative.
J. Heinrichs read her decision so fast into the record that it was impossible to accurately keep up. To add insult to injury, Heinrichs, as is the new norm in judicial decision making, after asking for Grabavac’s opinion (as if she couldn’t make this decision on her own) refused to provide me with a written copy of her decisions, forcing me to pay for them from the only transcriber authorized to print them, JC Word Assist. Remember, I had a friend, with 25 years transcribing experience and listed on the Provincial Gov’t list for authorized transcribers, kindly offer to do my transcripts. But no, the Commie BC Gov’t has an exclusive, monopolistic contract with JC Word that only they can produce criminal transcripts for huge bankruptcy level fees.
Thus, if I am eventually required to pay for all transcripts in this case, it will cost over $13 000.00, though some of this has been paid to cover the Jordan delay appeal grounds only. Much thanks and gratitude for all the kind support for this. Believe me, it is not easy to have to ask for donations for this reason. These transcripts fees are pure theft and denial of justice. If you wish the Judge to order the Gov’t to produce them, you have to absurdly and unreasonably release all your confidential, financial privacy information on open public court record.
JC Word is now forcing me to pay $680 for 90 min worth of transcripts of Heinrichs reading her decision into the record this past Friday alone. Appealing on sentence is not possible without these transcripts. Can you imagine what this case would have cost with a lawyer? Lawyers charge, minimally, $1 000/day in court. There were at least six trial hearing dates, and dozens of other appearances ($500/day for appearances.) Plus, prep time, plus disbursements, plus…plus…plus. Lawyer’s fees + transcripts for an appeal would have amounted to close to $30 000.00, minimally, and likely more. And I would have been screwed even if I had a lawyer…the fix in this politically motivated case was in from the beginning, and I have maintained the Judge was biased since she was appointed. But representing oneself had a cost and took away hundreds of hours of my life in research, court time and visits, study, preparation, and now in jail. I could have been much more effective on freedom issues if these falsified charges were not advanced or prosecuted as should have been the case.
I am not above admitting if I did something wrong. However, I will maintain down till the day I die, that I did nothing wrong here. I am knowledgeable enough on law to know this. Dr. Pollock and the IH officials were covering up for their corruption and useless and unlawful mask orders. Which is why they eventually refused to answer our questions. The problems lie with the Gov’t, Crown and judiciary. This was done simply to frighten everyone into doing what they are told, even if the Gov’t is acting unlawfully or unconstitutionally.
Please join me on Monday, August 19, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. for my hearing on having this jail sentence stayed pending my appeal. Grabavac, as is his usual, will oppose everything just for the sake of abuse of power.
As an aside, I have laid criminal charges of nuisance under s. 140 and a charge under s. 423 of the Criminal Code. Once charges are laid, I am required to give the AG notice and he has a right to appear at the process (screening) hearing, where I merely must show that I have some evidence on each element of the offence. This is a very low test to meet. Suddenly, even before I had served the AG, I received an email from Jessica Paterson on behalf of the AG this past Friday, that she was staying the charges, with no reasons given. AGAIN.
Further, I also laid a private prosecution of an assault charge against PM Justin Trudeau for his assault on reported Keean Bexte in Tofino recently. This assault was much more egregious than the mere touching in my case (indeed, the security guards actually assaulted me by physically blocking my access.) AGAIN, before I could even serve the AG with a copy of this charge, the AG has emailed me to stay this charge as well, with no reasons given. This is amazing and nothing short of a cover up of criminal activities by Trudeau.
Remember the SNC Lavalin affair, where Trudeau was caught unlawfully interfering with the independence of the Attorney General of Canada, Judy Raybould? Has Trudeau now also interfered with the Attorney General of BC to get them to stay this charge against him???? It seems a logical conclusion, or even that members of the AG are politically supportive of the Socialist/Communist Trudeau and are simply protecting him at all costs. Remember too, Victoria is the leftist/Socialist/Communist capital of BC.
Why does the PM get to physically assault people with impunity and if we exercise our rights and freedoms, are charged for so doing?
This again, illustrates a disturbing trend in Canada of Gov’t officials using the power of the State to attack us and deny us our rights and freedoms with impunity, and then charging us for simply exercising our rights and freedoms.
refer
————————————–
City of Kelowna v David Lindsay et al
Petition to Stop Rallies
Week of September 3, 2024 10:00 a.m.
1355 Water St.
Kelowna Courthouse
for hearing on my SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) application to strike the City’s Petition against us. (See the B.C. Protection of Public Participation Act)
https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/19003
We had one day before the Hon. Justice Hardwick. The remaining two days were canceled apparently due to the judge either being ill or otherwise not available to appear.
There has now been a further three days set aside during the week of Sept. 3, 2024 for the continuation of this hearing. I will be notified on the Friday, Aug. 30, 2024 of what days this will be. Considering that Monday, Sept. 2 is Labour Day, it appears we will be heard starting Tuesday or Wednesday of that week.
Our documents in this case are located on our website at:
All City of Kelowna documents and pleadings are now placed on our website for public viewing: https://clearbc.org/city-of-kelowna/
————————————–
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Digital-ID-Surveillance-and-the-Value-of-Privacy_Justice-Centre-for-Constitutional-Freedoms.pdf
Please remember other innocent people who have stood up for our rights and freedoms against our tyrannical governments during COVID-19 and to the present, who are now in the midst of their ongoing, oppressive trials:
Tamara Lich
Chris Barber
The Coutts prisoners: Anthony Olienick and Chris Carbert
Pat King
Tommy Robinson
and many other real victims.
NOTE: Jury deliberations are set to commence on Wed this week at Coutts, after the Judge reads about 70 pages of instructions to the jury.
Ask yourself, why are 70+ pages of instructions required for a jury to only consider the facts? I have seen similar instructions in the past and it is amazing how anyone can be found innocent by a jury after a judge reads these instructions, which on one hand tell the jury how important their functions are and that they are only to try the facts, and then by the time the instructions are read to them, leave them with almost no doubt that the judge believes that the prisoners are guilty.
————————————–
————————————–
Empower Hour
Every Wednesday Action4Canada hosts the Empower Hour, an online zoom meeting open to everyone. We have a special guest each week, who will educate, inform and answer your burning questions. Also, watch the Weekly Updates HERE.
To be kept informed of these webinars sign up for our Email Updates so as to receive advance notification along with details on how to pre-register for each Empower Hour webinar.
August 14th, 2024
Sign on starts at: 4.30pm PST/7.30pm EST
Pre-Register Now for this Webinar
Join us! Share this page and link with your friends and social media!
Know Your Rights:
Guidelines for Peaceful Protesting/Gathering/Rallies and/or Attending Events (eg. Council Meetings, School Boards, Handing out Flyers)
https://action4canada.com/know-your-rights-guidelines
Check out A4C for some of the most successful actions and strategies available to us!
And a big thank you to Tanya for all her hard work and dedication and support for the Christian principles that founded our nation!
————————————–
REMINDER
New Credit Card Fees & Lack of Privacy
It is starting – Use cash as much as possible – use credit cards or digital only if there is no other alternative.
The Bank of Canada is admittedly planning for digital currency. It claims that it will not replace cash – BUT – and here is the caveat, it will continue to use cash “notes for as long as Canadians want them.”
In other words, if you don’t use cash, you will lose it. Reading between the lines, it is clear that the Gov’t will simply issue press releases and polls showing most Canadians don’t use and/or don’t want cash, and then the Bank of Canada will claim it has to eliminate cash because few people are using it or want it, and it is, ironically, too costly to maintain printing the notes and coins.
https://www.bankofcanada.ca/digitaldollar/#what-digital-canadian
Bill Still, the US Patriot and author of the incredible documentary, The Money Masters, outlines the results of recent polls showing that 86% of Canadians fear the digital dollar!!! Wow.
87% of Canadians have heard or are aware of the Bank of Canada’s CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency), and 82% are strongly opposed to it!!
More on this issue in the next newsletter!
Companies will not use digital currency if we are not using digital currency!
It will cost them too much in lost business.
Here is two awesome posters that you can distribute to all businesses to put on their entrance doors, advocating for the use of cash. Print on 8 1/2 x 11 glossy hard stock for best results.
For Business owners:
The dangers of digital gov’t ID and currencies are here… you need to use cash as much as possible. As recognized by Freedom Rising, there are many inherent dangers of using digital currency. What do you do, not if, but when:
The internet is down
There is a power outage
The card reader malfunctions
Your phone battery dies or doesn’t work for other reasons
WE SUGGEST YOU CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS WELL:
Your phone is stolen
Your passwords are co-opted
Your credit/debit card strip is damaged – needs replacing
There are errors in relation to the quantum of $$ on your card
Gov’t limits your purchases/CRA liens the balance on your card
AND MANY OTHER DANGERS
CLEAR has promoted the non-use of digital currencies and credit/debit cards as much as possible, for years.
Suggested Solution:
Withdraw money on Saturday/Sunday from the bank or bank machine, and then leave your money at home if you are scared to carry it with you, and just carry the amounts of cash for each day’s purchases for the week.
NO MORE CARDS!!!! NO EXCUSES!
USE CASH $$$$$$$$$
Do you want to be the next person to be “unbanked” because of your political beliefs????
Get these cards below at the CLEAR booth to give out everytime you use cash – or print your own to hand out!
Make Business sized cards to hand out at all your cash purchases!
————————————–
Kindness of the week
To all the kind people in Kelowna, BC and Canada who have supported me against the corrupt political prosecution over the past 32 months, for a crime I did not commit. Everyone knows this was a political show trial from the beginning. It was to send a message to freedom-oriented Canadians, you will comply or go to jail. We all need to continue to send the message that if the Gov’t takes our rights and freedoms away, we will not comply!!
Thank you so much to everyone for all your kind support.
Please continue our public displays of freedom, whether I am physically present or not. I will be back, hopefully sooner than later, but I will be back.
Thank you!!!
————————————–
CLEARBITS:
The Federal Conservatives have introduced Bill C-400 into Parliament recently. It has passed first reading on June 13, 2024 and going to 2nd reading, committee stage and third reading before going to the Senate, if it passes in House of Commons.
An Act to establish a framework for the continued access to and use of cash in Canada and to make related amendments to other Acts
Contact your MP today and make your voice known to support this Bill!
It is a short Bill, but has important qualifications upon the Gov’t to ensure access to cash for the protection of privacy and vulnerable people in our society.
The primary concern I have is that there is no reference to the quantum of cash in the Bill. We must ensure that if people wish to walk around with wheelbarrows or pockets full of cash, they have this right and privacy, to so do. Presently, there is no reference to quantity, implying that possibly in the future Parliament may put limits on the amount of cash required to be made available and how much we can use or carry at any given time without being deemed a crook
https://tnc.news/2024/08/13/bill-bans-central-bank-digital-currency/
https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-400/first-reading
Thank you, Tanya for this update
————————————–
In an ongoing disturbing trend across the Commonwealth, governments are permitting an invasion of our culture and law to take place, and protecting the invaders and charging us. Similar to that which is occurring here in Canada where gov’t officials are breaking the law and we are being charged.
The real solution is in the Coronation Oath and the promise of the Monarch to “maintain and uphold” the principles of the Protestant Christian religion. All MPs have sworn an oath to the Monarch and have no more powers that the King. The King must refuse all immigration that is contrary to the Christian religion. THAT is the answer.
————————————–
Attacks are starting against Telegram – why not against Whatsapp, or Signal? Because they have been infiltrated and are not a threat to Globalism and Gov’t corruption. It is starting by Gov’ts blaming Telegram for opposition to its corrupt policies and already England has now threatened to shut down Telegram in that country.
————————————–
English PM Keir Starmer’s comments supporter the BLM protests in the USA, and opposing when white people riot against immigration crimes.
https://x.com/mrandyngo/status/1820477747799437793?s=52
————————————–
Have you noticed Google searches are no longer turning up what you are looking for?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K297opaBp8E
————————————–
Is the Federal NDP caucus looking to remove Singh?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsaUgvXomgk
Sunday Paper Deliveries
Next delivery day:
Summer Holidays
(Weather Permitting)
————————————–
A bit about David
Due to time constraints right now, I will try and complete Part II asap.
Thanks for your patience.
Freedom Rallies
“It ain’t over till it’s over”
Next Kelowna Rallies:
Saturday,
August 17, 2024
Hwy 97 & Cooper
Join us for important announcements on the local, legal scene, and informative speakers!
August 17, 2024 12:00 noon
Vernon Freedom Rally
12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. @ Polson Park
Join Darren for the Largest rally in the North Okanagan, and growing weekly!
North Okanagan Shuswap Freedom Radio
http://s1.voscast.com:11464/stream
—————
August 17, 2024 12:00 noon
O.K. Falls Freedom Rally
11:30 a.m.
Across from Esso Station
—————
August 17, 2024 12:00 noon
Oliver Freedom Rally
12:00 p.m.
Town Hall
—————
August 17, 2024 12:00 noon
Kamloops Freedom Gathering
Valleyview Centennial Park
—————————————
CLEAR Telegram
With almost 600 members now and growing, join us in our C.L.E.A.R. Telegram group! Please remember: no foul language, abuse or vulgarity for any posts, keep posts relevant to today’s freedom issues, humour is fine, be respectful at all times. Government officials, police, agents or their posts are not accepted nor permitted on this site. Please ensure as best you can, that material you post is accurate and correct. Posting false or incorrect information is not acceptable.
Help us ensure all posts are verified for correctness.
Opinions and discussions on relevant issues are also encouraged.
This is a private group for trusted people and friends only.
https://t.me/+SWxndPh1I9F2Iu-q